The review indicates the band played General Patton's "Get Up Punk". On the last tour they were playing Lovage's "Anger Management". There are videos of that on YouTube if you look.
Have to say I'm pretty excited to hear some General Patton played live. Vaguely hoping for some new tracks too but I don't think that's going to happen.
At that time the show had just been cancelled and was winding up it's last season (7) in the US, while in Australia I believe they were showing Season 5.
Well on Saturday the "spoiled" episode was played and I was surprised as all heck. The memory of the Scripting News post flooded back not long after watching, but I'd completely forgotten it before hand.
It's a combination of the fact I was barely watching the show at the time and probably didn't link the name to the character and the fact it was well over a year ago when I read that item.
The thing is... if it had have been surrounded by "spoiler warnings", I'd have read it anyway because I was barely watching the show and didn't mind being spoilt. Further, the "spoiler warnings" would have stapled the fact in my head forever to be remembered.
Without the warnings I glanced at it and moved on, forgot the fact and enjoyed the season without foreknowledge spoiling the experience.
I'm rather surprised I remembered it at all even after the fact, especially the fact I remembered where I read it.
I think there is something in that for all of us...
Going from memory and with a little research on Wikipedia, I've figured out that pretty much every track I've bought on iTunes is either independent or not EMI.
That is expected...
Here I was thinking it was just the mySpace generation that thought no digital rights management = free and legal to copy, but it seems that stupidity has spread to the media. Just like how you can go and kill someone because there isn't anything to stop you. Oh yeah, except the law.
Anyway, here's the new deal:
EMI has been at the front of non-DRM sales lately, experimenting with selling their artists albums in MP3 format.
The extra quality appeals to me hugely as I've often called for Apple to sell lossless downloads. 256kbps isn't lossless but it's a huge step up and I'm willing to pay more for better quality.
The DRM on iTunes tracks has never been a problem for me but it will mean any tracks I buy will be easier to back up (no need to back up licenses too, just the track), easier to convert to WAV (via iTunes instead of via my soundcard) and easier to burn to CD outside of iTunes.
Others have noted that better quality means that it's easier to add watermarking to each file downloaded (meaning that if it turns up on P2P it can be traced to the buyer). I don't see a problem with that and I've always assumed iTunes tracks had watermarks anyway.
Apple press release | EMI press release | Slashdot | The Age | BoingBoing