Star Trek (2009)  #
Tuesday, 19 May 2009 05:33PM
Spoilers. You have been warned. I may never warn you again.

Side note: Any review without spoilers is called advertising. I now strongly feel the only relevant reviews (of film or otherwise) are those written for an audience who has also read/seen/consumed the item being reviewed.


I am a Star Trek fan. But...

I grew up on Next Generation, saw a lot of Voyager (but never saw the end), saw a bit of Deep Space 9 and none of Enterprise. I have seen the occasional Original Series episode and have seen all of the movies. I remember very little of any of the movies except the first one, the last NextGen film and "the whale one".

I have no real love or connection with any Original Series characters. I am a William Shatner fan.

I'm such a non-Star-Trek-fans that I had no idea that the movie was an alternate Star Trek universe until Vulcan, and even then I had to really think about it.

So...

I liked the new movie. It was exciting. It looked nice. It invoked deep memories of the old movies. I came out of it generally satisfied.

On reflection there is much in the movie I didn't like.

I felt many of the "Galaxy Quest" humour bits were misplaced ("help, I'm stuck in a pipe", "Kirk is sleeping with a Green Woman!", "red shirt", "Walken!", "Numb Tongue? I can fix that!").

I hated Scotty's little friend. OK, I liked his eyes, and his whimper.

I hated all of the snow planet. The chase. The snow. The planet. Spock. Why not just land the pod next to Spock? It's just as dumb.

I hated the Kirk-as-a-kid car chase, although I think Beastie Boys was an inspired song selection. I spent most of the scene ignoring little-Kirk, instead thinking about Shatner-Kirk listing to Beastie Boys.

Perhaps unfairly in the context of every other action movie, I took offence to the bar-brawl. Glassing someone is never cool Kirk.

So... lots to hate.

And yet, I enjoyed it. I guess I expected nothing. Less than nothing. The fact it was alternate-universe helped, even though that generally annoys me (Terminator 3 I'm looking at you).

I chose to see it as a Star Trek side project. A side story that overall is irrelevant. One that need not continue. And yet, I see hundreds of Kevin J. Anderson books about the alternate history retelling of the Star Trek universe. This fills me with unfulfilled vomiting.

Mid way through the film I started imagining the whole set up like that in "Southland Tales". An alternate universe, accidentally created, and the inevitability of relationships and connections.

Wanky I know. Can't you just see Spock and Kirk floating through space, leaning forward to touch hands as a black hole rips apart Earth beneath them?

I'll admit that I recently read TekWar (from the fantastic mind of William Shatner) and to help enjoy that massively average book, I thought constantly about how it would be possible to create a world where some technology is rubbish (everything appears to based on fax machines) and yet have flying cars and human perfect robots. I decided it had something to do with Mexico.

I think that explains everything...

Update: I felt bad for not properly mentioning Sylar as Spock. He was made for this part and there has rarely been a more perfect casting. Loved him. The others were fine, but in a completely different league.


Moonchild Trio  #
Tuesday, 19 May 2009 04:25PM
A friend recently lent me all four Moonchild Trio CDs (thanks Dave).

Moonchild Trio are Mike Patton (vocals), Trevor Dunn (bass) and Joey Baron (drums), with music written by John Zorn. The first two albums are just Mike/Trevor/Joey, while the last two add extra musicians, including Zorn himself.

The first two albums released in 2006 ("Moonchild: Songs Without Words" , "Astronome") were interesting but didn't excite me much. The bass/drums combination is great, but all Patton appears to do is scream randomly over the top. I'd like to pretend I found something artistic in the combination but I didn't.

"Six Litanies for Heliogabalus" released in 2007 is much better. More musicians are added and the music gains a lot for it. It's a much more coherent piece of music I was happy to concentrate on for an hour, with enough musical variety to prevent boredom. There is only so much screaming a man can take.

"The Crucible" (2008) returns more to the feel of the previous two albums, but with Zorn on sax. While I found it interesting to listen to Patton and the sax play off each other, and I loved one song ("Witchfinder"), I liked this only slightly more than the first two albums.

If I was to buy any, I'd get "Six Litanies..." on CD, and maybe get "Witchfinder" on iTunes.